Activity
Posted in Ruby Scripts & IRB Discussion
Definitely! Idk if I mentioned it in the video or not but you can go up the list with shift tab. š
Posted in Classes & Objects in Ruby Discussion
Thanks a bunch, Muhammad! I'm hoping to get the module video out in the very near future.
Posted in Hashes in Ruby Discussion
Hey Yago, while this is true, HashWithIndifferentAccess is only available via ActiveSupport. This section of the learning path is focused purely on Ruby.
Well, looked into it further. Def a bug. Rails doesn't like when you try to send that stuff through with the keys for the tasks as dom_id's which is a bummer. I got a fix you can see here https://github.com/gorails-screencasts/dynamic-nested-forms-with-turbo-get/commit/adfe726005c89f1c71b81f1ddf63c797bddad80a
I'm gonna look into this more when a have some free time to see what else can be done here bc I feel like there's a better option. Sorry about that but thanks for bringing it up, Willard!
Hmmm, I not sure but let me look into that for you and report back!
Awesome! Glad to hear that Giedrius!
Posted in Law of Demeter and Delegation Discussion
Another wonderful comment, Ann! :) Thanks for the kind words, glad you appreciate the vibes and video as well!
Hey there, I appreciate the comment. I do address this in the video though in addition to being able to use debugger
instead of / in addition to binding.break
.
Hey Nick, that was a scheduling mistake on our end. That video won't be out until August. Sorry for the confusion!
Hey Terry! Thanks so much for the kind words and Iām super glad to hear that you enjoyed it and got some new tricks out of it!
Actually, I take it all back. What we have in the video is what we wanted. Adding started?
caused the code to not function properly. The running?
method that is not shown in the video is where the check for your suggestion lives. So we have since added the running?
method back and reverted active?
to just be end_time.future?
Yep! There was actually another method below the ones shown in the video that did just that so we didn't do that here (for the active? method). But we have since removed the other method in the codebase and adjusted active? to cover this. Thanks for the comment and sorry for any confusion!
Agreed!
We can get that linked up in the notes soon. Will report back once complete!
Posted in Understand Scope Returns Discussion
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it and learned something new!!
Posted in Integers & Floats in Ruby Discussion
Glad you found the video contents useful, thank you for watching!
Hey Fernando! That's awesome to hear! I'm glad you enjoyed it and thanks for leaving your comment. Thanks for watching!
Posted in Loops & Blocks in Ruby Discussion
Sure thing, I'll work on writing something up soon and/or add a video about this. One thing to think about in the meantime is this: A method (typically) is "bound" to a specific object, causing self to refer to that object when the method is invoked. On the other hand, a Proc lacks this behavior, as self relies on the context in which the Proc was created or called.
Posted in Conditionals in Ruby Discussion
Thanks a bunch! I'm glad you are enjoying them all!
Only two available at the moment but more to come soon!